I got the claim filed.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The author filed a counter claim.

Noting also that claim number 4002126 was thus filed as a consolidated claim in the name of Syndicate 1131 at Lloyd's,

The Panel notes that Kuwait has restructured this claim unit since it was originally filed.

The author's claim was thereafter dismissed and following the rejection of his claim, the author filed four successive motions in the Supreme Court.

In one claim, a husband who filed a category A claim during the regular filing period explained that he was unable to file a category C claim at the same time because no claim forms were available.

Iraq asserts that this claim unit should be rejected as a claim filed after the expiry of the applicable deadline.

Then you can have the claim filed and be back here all the sooner.

review by the Panel of the F3 claim filed by kuwait on behalf of the national committee History of the F3 claim

Category C claim filed for the death of a detainee during the regular filing period

In addition, the Panel took up for review one sub category F3 claim filed by Kuwait.

Iran, therefore, could have included these claim units in the submissions that it filed within these deadlines.

They include one category D claim filed by Kuwait on behalf of an individual who was recently killed as a result of a landmine explosion.

As the business licence holder had filed a claim with the Commission, the Panel was able to compare his signature on documents submitted with his claim against the signature on the rent a permit agreement.

The secretariat identified 25 category A claims filed by the Government of the Sudan for a high amount by claimants that had also filed claims in other claim categories.

Four of these claims were filed as category D claims in the regular claims programme, while the fifth claimant filed a category C claim in this late claims programme.

In addition, they include one additional deceased detainee claim filed through Kuwait on behalf of an Iranian national.

Kuwait filed a category D claim in respect of this deceased detainee as part of the special instalment.

The two errors identified by the OIOS relate to one claim filed by the Kuwaiti Ministry of Defense.

The remaining claim was deferred pending the receipt of a response to a request for information concerning the identity and evidence of authority of the individual who filed a claim on behalf of a deceased person.

The company considered that the costs for carrying out the work had risen disproportionately and, on 7 October 1988, filed and administrative claim against the Province of Neuquén, which was dismissed in 1989, for having been filed out of time.

As a claim has already been filed for this detainee, the Panel took no further action concerning this request.

I filed defense statements, but it was useless.

The secretariat was further instructed to request Iran to provide information on the steps that it had taken to ensure that this claim did not duplicate, wholly or in part, any other claim that it had filed with the Commission.

The secretariat was further instructed to request Kuwait to provide information on the steps that it had taken to ensure that this claim did not duplicate, wholly or in part, any other claim that Kuwait had filed with the Commission.

Due to an alleged failure from ENTEL to comply with the contract terms, the company filed an administrative claim against ENTEL in 1987, which was dismissed in May 1988.

As a result of further information received from the Governments of India, Pakistan and the Philippines, one claim submitted by the Government of India, one claim submitted by the Government of Pakistan and 22 claims submitted by the Government of the Philippines have been identified as having been filed for a higher amount in category A by a claimant who had also filed a claim in another claim category.

2.3 Royal filed a claim in the Utrecht Regional Court against the author and VVAA for compensation for the remaining damages.

The Panel reviewed each proposed amendment to ensure that it did not constitute a new claim filed after the appropriate deadlines.

This took account of the fact that had the claim for small personal losses been filed during the Commission's regular filing period, it would have been possible for the claim to be filed in category C and therefore assessed on the evidentiary standard applicable to category C claims.

A total of 37 confirmed matches were identified, which related either to claims filed by the same claimant within the bedoun programme or to claims filed by the same claimant in different claim categories.

The Panel further determined that the existence of a previously filed claim in another claim category might, but does not necessarily, indicate that the claimant had a full and effective opportunity to file a claim during the regular filing period.

With the approval of the Governing Council, Kuwait has filed one additional category D claim on behalf of one individual who was killed as a result of a landmine explosion.

Each claimant alleged that he was renting the business licence from the business licence holder, who filed a claim with the Commission, but not in respect of the disputed business.

The claim was dismissed.

Claim password was erroneous

The Memorial was filed within the prescribed time limit.

The Memorial was filed within the prescribed time limit.

The Reply was filed within the prescribed time limit.

The Memorial was filed within the prescribed time limit.

The Memorial was filed within the prescribed time limit.

On 14 October 1999, the Supreme Court dismissed the claim, considering that it had not been filed within the statutory time limits.

On 28 December 1990, the company filed an independent claim in the National Supreme Court of Justice (Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación), which in June 1992, decided that it lacked jurisdiction and that the complainant company should have filed its claim in the local courts established in the contract.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.