No one was expelled until a final decision had been made on the asylum claim.

The claim was dismissed.

Claim password was erroneous

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

This claim was hugely misguided.

Germans claim the British started it, British claim it was the Germans.

We do not claim to have made a perfect document.

Neither claimant made reference to the other in his claim.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

Therefore, the total recommended award made by the F3 Panel in respect of the original F3 claim was USD 177,109,000.

Consequently, a correction should be made in respect of this claim.

That claim was even more far fetched.

Suriname made it possible for pregnant women to claim redress for dismissal.

It was the early 1930s, and Kazakhstan was in the grip of a man made catastrophe that would claim millions of lives across the Soviet Union.

Leninists claim war grew out of imperialism and was fueled by capitalist rivalries and others claim it was a war between

Many Kennedy supporters claim that he would never have made such a mistake.

Look, suppose you claim you have made a list of all the decimals.

The government claim was that he was planning to publish these.

That's not my claim, that's a ClA claim you can read it, it was declassified a while ago.

Hooke made the claim that Newton had been inspired by Hooke's work in physics.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

Having been informed of the clerical error, the Panel considered the information in respect of the claim and determined that the claim is ineligible. Consequently, a correction should be made in respect of this claim.

At his interview, the claimant was unable to describe the operations of the business and made several statements that were inconsistent with his claim file.

When the IPCC first made the claim, global warming activists and renewable energy companies cheered.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

Claim No. 4002545 was originally in the E2 claims category.

All they needed was a single claim of copyright infringement.

Now, son, I didn't claim they was her naturalborn children.

In one claim, a husband who filed a category A claim during the regular filing period explained that he was unable to file a category C claim at the same time because no claim forms were available.

This aspect of the original F3 claim was remitted to the Registrar of the Commission, allocated a new claim number, and set aside for future review (the current F3' claim ).

Noting also that claim number 4002126 was thus filed as a consolidated claim in the name of Syndicate 1131 at Lloyd's,

In 2004, the Fort McKay claim was settled, involving 20,000 acres.

Or do you still claim that knife was planted on ya?

Of these, the total amount awarded for one claim was increased by USD 682,000 and the total amount awarded for the other claim was decreased by USD 3,234,000.

This claim was initially part of Syria's fourth F4 instalment claim No. 5000457 for remediation of damage to agricultural and forestry resources.

The secretariat's review of the documents provided in support of this claim indicated that the claimant's D6 claim was complementary to, and not a duplicate of, his C6 claim, and therefore the deduction initially performed by the secretariat was incorrect.

And yours was one of them, Gorlopis. That's how I knew your claim was crooked.

The Court made short shrift of Ellwanger's claim, becauseall human beings can be the victims of racism.

The Panel also reviewed each individual claim and its related E4 claim to ensure that there was no likelihood of duplication of awards.

The author's claim was thereafter dismissed and following the rejection of his claim, the author filed four successive motions in the Supreme Court.

Everyone could claim victory, and no one was obliged to acknowledge defeat.