Let's assume you go to the Caribbean, or you might go to Mexico.

You assume that.

Did you assume you were discharged?

I assume you have standards.

In principle, a single country might have to assume the entire burden of losses.

Do you assume the full responsibility?

I assume you mean me, too?

or did you just assume it?

But why do you assume that...

What did you assume she meant?

Did you assume that you would have something?

Now let's assume you go on holiday.

All parallelograms you cannot assume to be rectangles.

All parallelograms you cannot assume to be rhombi.

What right had you to assume that responsibility?

I assume you want to help your husband?

Without knowing her reason how can you assume

and are you ready to assume the responsibilities...

Some might assume that bond markets are shielded from the effects of climate change, ecosystem degradation, and water scarcity.

I assume the two of you know each other.

But let's assume, theoretically, you want to do that.

I'm going to assume that you have the textbook.

You merely assume it. What other assumption is possible?

Well, they'll assume you came in by the window.

On the contrary, ordinary Swedish rapists and abusers of women should assume that the police might not respond when called.

By virtue of their economic might and their ability to assume increased obligations, Germany and Japan should become permanent members.

Otherwise, the United Nations might find itself compelled to assume great responsibilities for humanitarian and related operations in particularly inauspicious circumstances.

I can understand why people who work with and live with children might assume the right and responsibility to protect them.

How do you explain when things don't go as we assume?

So maybe you know, we'll just assume that is doesn't change.

How do you explain when things don't go as we assume?

My dear, you mustn't assume guilt for something that was unavoidable.

Ah, there, my good man. I assume my assistant sent you.

You might.

I assume you sent for me because somebody told you I was the best.

You might get bored and you might wanna tweet amongst yourselves.

A postulate or an axiom is something that you just assume, you assume from the get go, while a theorem is something you prove using more basic, or using some postulates or axioms.

You cannot assume this. Determinant operations are not linear on matrix addition.

And I'm debating on what I should assume that you already know.

You can just assume that it wasn't changing over that time period.

Or you could just assume it's a function of x and y.

Now you probably assume, well the governments are going to do something.

You will therefore assume the position of a suppliant before this throne.

Furthermore, the French Government was bound to assume that other States might take note of these statements and rely on their being effective .

let me just draw them first then you might, you might, it might start to make sense.