61. In contrast, his delegation had no objection to article 6 (Cessation of wrongful conduct).

There is an internationally wrongful act of a State when conduct consisting of an action or omission

A different scenario would exist if the mandated conduct necessarily implied the commission of a wrongful act.

(a) The conduct that the responsible State should take in order to cease the wrongful act, if it is continuing

37. Turning to chapter IV of document A 48 10, he said that the express provision in article 6 (Cessation of wrongful conduct) that the cessation of wrongful conduct in the case of a wrongful act attributable to a State should be considered quot without prejudice to the responsibility it has already incurred quot , constituted a very important safeguard clause.

According to article 17 on State responsibility, conduct is required to be wrongful both for the organization which directs and controls and for the organization and State whose conduct is directed and controlled.

They agreed with the International Law Commission that cessation of wrongful conduct should be dealt with separately from the different forms of reparation.

We hope that the State concerned will heed the just calls of the international community and change its wrongful conduct as soon as possible.

Nevertheless, it was unfortunate that the distinction between cessation of wrongful conduct and restitution might get blurred since the provision on reparation was a general one and did not distinguish between wrongful acts having a continuing character and all other types.

The degree of responsibility of the organization should be much less if the State's wrongful conduct was only authorized, but not requested, by the organization.

7. Concerning Part Two of the draft articles on State responsibility, his delegation welcomed the separate handling of the cessation of wrongful conduct and reparation.

The case of the breach of an obligation to achieve a certain result appears to imply the possibility of an exception to the general principle, which was stated in draft article 3, that an internationally wrongful act presupposes an organization's wrongful conduct.

In addition, with regard to international crimes, aggression must be separated from other crimes, even though the two types of wrongful conduct could take place simultaneously.

the term controls' refers to cases of domination over the commission of wrongful conduct and not simply the exercise of oversight, still less mere influence or concern.

Legal consequences of an internationally wrongful act

Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts

The internationally wrongful act of a State

Recite what has been revealed to you of the Book , and maintain the prayer . Indeed the prayer restrains from indecent and wrongful conduct , and the remembrance of Allah is surely greater .

Countermeasures in respect of an internationally wrongful act

(a) The internationally wrongful act has ceased and

the internationally wrongful act of an international organization

Chapter IV of part one of the draft articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts envisages certain instances in which a State is held responsible for conduct attributable to another State.

59 35. Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts

56 83. Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts

Responsibility of a State for its internationally wrongful acts

Elements of an internationally wrongful act of a State

62 61. Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts

Investigation into allegations of wrongful termination and sexual harassment

This would be a case in which the international organization's request had not called for the wrongful conduct in which the member State had engaged (statement by the Russian Federation, A C.6 59 SR.

Characterization of an act of a State as internationally wrongful

The assumption is that the State or international organization which is the addressee of the decision is not given discretion to take conduct that, while complying with the decision, would not constitute an internationally wrongful act.

In this case, the conduct of member States would not per se be wrongful under the treaty it would only be the occasion for the organization to comply with its obligation or fail to do so.

Mexico believed that legitimizing the imposition of unilateral sanctions by one or more States in response to the wrongful conduct of another State was contrary to the norms of international law and might exacerbate international conflicts.

Aid or assistance in the commission of an internationally wrongful act

Agenda item 139 Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (continued)

Articles on the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts, art.

This means that other States often have to take action against parties with little or no understanding of what wrongful conduct occurred (or is occurring), hampering any national investigative or enforcement actions they might wish to take.

Where several States are injured by the same internationally wrongful act, each injured State may separately invoke the responsibility of the State which has committed the internationally wrongful act.

Conduct

(b) The act would be internationally wrongful if committed by that State.

Direction and control exercised over the commission of an internationally wrongful act

The State responsible for the internationally wrongful act is under an obligation

(b) The act would be internationally wrongful if committed by that State.

(b) The act would be internationally wrongful if committed by that organization.

Direction and control exercised over the commission of an internationally wrongful act