Indeed, the only peer reviewed overview of EU climate policy estimates that it can avoid climate related damage of about 10 billion per year.

Politicizing EU Competition Policy

Russia had a low profile, but the EU, which considers itself the leader of climate policy, was simply informed post factum.

The Climate Policy Trap

King Coal s Climate Policy

Climate Change Policy Initiatives

A New Climate Policy Paradigm

In order to ensure this outcome, the EU must begin preparing a Plan B that accounts for the coming climate policy paradigm shift.

It is important to examine this approach, not only because the EU is pursuing the world s largest and most ambitious climate policy, but also because other climate policies suffer from similar shortcomings.

The first victim of such a crisis will be the top down approach to climate policy pursued by the EU and many prominent scientists.

In fact, new studies show that 38 of the EU carbon cuts leak elsewhere, meaning that European climate policy avoids not three cents of climate damage per dollar spent, but less than two.

So international climate policy needs a paradigm shift.

These anti scientific approaches affected not only climate policy, but also foreign policy.

The collateral damage for EU foreign policy is also significant.

61. The international economic policy climate had improved greatly.

The greatest success of Europe s external policy has been EU enlargement.

New financing could unlock today s policy inertia over climate change.

Therefore the real results of this EU agreement on climate funding remain to be seen.

And the development of EU military capacities and EU security policy is an important factor in European and global security.

In other words, the poor design of EU climate policies triples the cost and prevents only three cents of climate damage per dollar spent.

Previously, EU policy was to isolate Belarus, which itself was seeking isolation.

This means that EU policy must be tailor made for individual countries.

EU environmental policy has thus become a core area of European politics.

It s difficult to overstate what these findings mean for climate policy.

But, as these institutions mature, a more coherent EU foreign policy should emerge.

Its policy of opting out keeps Britain on the sidelines of the EU.

Romania welcomes the recent confirmation of such a policy by the EU Council.

This does not mean that climate change is not important it means only that the EU s climate policy is not smart.

How much worse can things get before the EU abandons its counter productive policy?

No policy area better illustrates this EU preference for talk over action than Pakistan.

The EU accession process has also underpinned a shift in Turkish policy on Iraq.

The EU is diligently echoing the criminal policy of collective punishment imposed by Israel.

Early and constant communication with Obama s top climate officials would help the EU understand the likely US position.

In other words, this strategy is compatible with EU accession only if the EU strengthens its own capacity for concerted action on foreign policy.

As a result, international climate policy would become unrecognizable, ineffective, and, ultimately, irrelevant.

First, policy frameworks for addressing climate change impacts and adaptation measures are often incomplete and second, government policy frameworks and regulation objectives are often inconsistent with climate change adaptation and mitigation goals.

As an organ of the EU, the EIB should be pursuing an ethical investment policy.

The EU has been working for a decade on a common foreign and security policy.

EU accession remains a dominant policy goal for a number of countries in the subregion.

In order for climate change policy and regulation to be effective, policy goals developed under different government structures must be harmonized.

First, the world s leading climate scientists and most of the world s governments have brought climate science to the forefront of global policy debates.

But this, not carbon emissions, should be the core of their climate change policy.

Participants included climate scientist Mike Hulme of the University of East Anglia, climate policy expert Roger Pielke Jr. of the University of Colorado, and climate economist Christopher Green of McGill University.

English Page This report is the first national communication presenting Norwegian climate policy according to the commitments under the Framework Convention on Climate Change.

putting a stop to Moscow s divide and conquer politics by adopting a common EU energy  policy