They should have a right of veto.

There should be no extension of the right of veto, and the use of the veto should be limited.

Moreover, we must do away with the right of the veto.

First, we have since 1945 opposed any extension of the veto right.

Moreover, Uruguay has always questioned the existence of the right of veto.

Croatia also endorses the limitation of the right and practice of veto.

Veto

Veto

First, Switzerland is opposed to granting the right of veto to new permanent members.

Chile supports the addition of new permanent members, but without the right of veto.

The rationale of the right of the veto was born of a different era.

The right of veto is not democratic, and therefore Mexico has never supported it.

Nonetheless, this does not preclude an independent royal decision to exercise a right of veto.

We must also do away with the right of veto, which often paralyses the Council.

Veto Oplock

Veto oplock

Veto files

Veto Oplock

THE VETO

Likewise, as a fundamental part of that reform, we should also study the right of veto.

Now the Soviet Union has vanished, but the Soviet style right of veto lives and prospers.

Fifthly, the framework within which the right of veto is used should be reviewed and defined.

The Government of Ecuador feels that we should consider restricting the right of veto of the permanent members to very specific subjects, with a view to eventually eliminating the veto.

The Hamas Veto

Veto oplock files

First, the two permanent seats to be allocated to Africa must include the right of the veto.

It is unrealistic to expect the five permanent members to give up their right to the veto.

More importantly, the right of veto, which was still subject to broad interpretation, should be properly defined.

The right of veto was accorded as a result of exceptional historical circumstances that no longer prevail.

If you could not persuade the House of Lords then they effectively had a right of veto.

We believe that the question of limiting the right of veto should be reconsidered in the coming months.

Samoa would support the creation of new permanent members for such States, but without the right to veto.

(b) That the new permanent members shall not exercise the right of veto until the question of the extension of the right of veto to new permanent members has been decided upon in the framework of the review mandated under paragraph 7 below

We would actually prefer that the right of veto be removed from the United Nations, as it is undemocratic.

The recourse to the veto in most of the above cases tarnished the veto mechanism.

As we understand it, Africa is seeking this right the right of veto on behalf of the entire African region, not for one or two States.

Limiting the Security Council Veto

Secondly, there is the veto.

Our preference is to limit the use of veto and to promote a veto free culture.

That position has not changed, and Africa clearly reiterated its principled opposition to the right of the veto at Ezulwini.

With respect to sensitive issues, including the right of the veto, the draft resolution includes unambiguous and therefore appropriate provisions.

Secondly, the right of veto undermines the principle of the sovereign equality of States as provided for in the Charter.

We have also said that we favour the establishment of a category of permanent member without the right of veto.

5. Viewing the right to veto as unavoidable at this time, Mongolia, nonetheless, would not be supportive of extending that right to other would be permanent members.

The EU s member governments name the members of the European Commission, and the Parliament lacks an explicit right to veto them.