It's not based upon evidence.

Hearsay evidence is not admissible.

In fact, the evidence does not always support this assumption.

In other patients, the evidence for steroids is not compelling.

CPP has not presented such evidence.

But economics is not evidence based in selecting its theoretical paradigms.

In two cases, the evidence was convincing but not fully substantiated.

Unfortunately, the evidence does not support this.

This allegation is not backed by evidence.

Did not find any evidence of upsuck.

That evidence was simply oral. There was not any supporting documentary evidence from the defendant.

Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense ?

is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense ?

Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense ?

is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense ?

And they will contest this because the evidence presented in an earlier mode is not in the way they would like the evidence presented.

There's actually ambiguous evidence as to whether you find reciprocity in other animals, but the evidence for people could not be clearer.

I was not the only one who did not give evidence.

The scientific evidence does not support such arguments.

Yet the evidence does not support this view.

The overwhelming evidence is that it does not.

Forensic evidence and expert witnesses are not allowed.

It's not so easy to arrange the evidence.

It may have included evidence of parallel pricing, for example, plus evidence of meetings or communications between competitors, but not direct evidence of agreement.

Is there ( not ) in these an adjuration ( or evidence ) for those who understand ?

Is there ( not ) in these an adjuration ( or evidence ) for those who understand ?

The court of cassation may not reappraise the evidence.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that it is not invoked frequently.

You're not on trial. There's no evidence against you.

According to the State party this proposition was not supported by any evidence during the court hearings and in fact, the evidence was to the contrary.

After thorough investigations, evidence relating to terrorist acts has not been found in those reports.

The circumstantial evidence of means, opportunity and motive, powerful in itself, does not stand alone.

Not much, the empirical evidence suggests. This might appear surprising.

By tomorrow morning there may not be any evidence left

The fact that no evidence was present in her body... does not mean that she was not raped, does it?

What evidence is good evidence?

So, why not let evidence, rather than theory, guide policy? Unfortunately, it is hard to get clear cut evidence of causality.

And I think there's evidence and it's not the only reason this evidence exists, but I think it's a huge cause

Persons detained for trial in one State may not be transferred to any other State for interrogation purposes and any evidence obtained in these circumstances shall not be admitted into evidence or used in any way to support a conviction.

However, these assumptions are not based on evidence which is in the possession of the Prosecutor.

The assessment of the evidence by the judge was not arbitrary.

The Commission did not find any other evidence on this subject.

It is acknowledged that the scientific evidence is not clear cut.

And the evidence for it preventing cancers is not yet great.

Are you trying to tell me what's evidence and what's not? .