This is what economists call a moral hazard.

Immoral.

Immoral!

We have a moral challenge in this moment.

Publication is a moral imperative.

We have a moral challenge in this movement.

It would be unconscionable.

It'd be immoral, you understand?

We have a moral obligation to help others and a moral duty to make sure our actions are effective.

There's going to have to be moral progress.

Damon Horowitz calls for a moral operating system

So let's get a moral framework.

Were the ECB to take aggressive action to bring them down, moral hazard would result countries would face no punishment for delaying reforms.

That is unacceptable by any moral standard.

And any moral work depends upon practical wisdom.

What these pictures demonstrate is that there is a moral sense across all religions, across all faiths, across all continents a moral sense that not only do we share the pain of others, and believe in something bigger than ourselves but we have a duty to act when we see things that are wrong that need righted, see injuries that need to be corrected, see problems that need to be rectified.

So I believe that we have an ethic that the Earth grows our food, and we need to move to an ethic in this century that the Earth should grow our homes.

came from a source of energy that was immoral human slaves.

The other lesson is moral, and it is more difficult.

Thus, whaling is unethical.

It must seek ethical and professional excellence.

The international community had a moral obligation to help such women.

I feel that there is a new moral hunger that is growing.

How can we use numbers as the basis for a moral framework?

But sharing isn't immoral it's a moral imperative.

It's law, it's morality, it's patent stuff.

It's most immoral for us to quarrel

In fact, come to think of it, it's downright immoral.

We need to recognize in the academy, I think, an ethical obligation, much stronger than the ones Stallman spoke of in the context of software.

I know there's a risk. Risk?

We see no moral justification for the perpetuation of this historical injustice.

Maybe there's another way that we can use numbers as the basis of our moral framework.

I want to know if there was a moral molecule.

I was reminded of a cardinal rule not a research rule, but a moral imperative from my upbringing

This conversation was on a high moral plane up to now.

Menace

DANGER

Danger.

They have an increased risk of infection, an increased risk of malignancy.

In Lebanon, censorship practices are either politically, religiously or morally motivated.

But these considerations are becoming more than an ethical choice.

On the other hand, even though they are savages, there... is a moral obligation.

The threat of biological terrorism differs from that of nuclear terrorism.

It could have interference in it which signals a potential danger, a potential danger.

Islam is dangerous.