But since we can assume it works for 2 we can now assume it works for 3.

I don't see that we can assume that.

So we have proven that we can assume that it's perpendicular

And we can assume that these are all at scale.

So we can assume that S is greater than 4 sides

Since we always assume or we normally assume that we start at distance is equal to 0, and we assume that start at time is equal to 0, we can write distance is equal to velocity average times time.

We are ready to assume responsibilities for targets that are sustainable and that we can actually meet.

If we can assume that these, this is a square matrix with an orthonormal set.

Well we have already proven that it works for 1 so we can assume it works for 1.

Well, we don't have anything written under here, but we can just assume that there's a 1, right?

We can't assume that, though.

We have to assume that.

We can assume, and we can do this we can say that the average of the initial and the final velocity is the average velocity, and then we multiply that times time.

But if we assume it's a neutral atom, we can say that this is also the number of electrons.

The GCC can and must assume that role.

I can assume here. 72 meters per second.

Without knowing her reason how can you assume

Now, given that we've shown this and we didn't assume this at all, let's see if we can show this.

Most people assume we use Photoshop.

We automatically assume he's a menace.

We assume that he broke in.

Now, if we can assume that c does not equal 0, this would be equal to what?

WE GOlNG TO ASSUME THAT ITS CONSTANT

Let's assume we have the following grid.

Now I assume that we remember dinosaurs.

Assume we expand from left to right.

And so the material can assume a lot of formats.

So in this situation, we could assume that x is f of x, and we could assume that g prime of x is cosine of x, or we could assume the other way around.

I think we can pretty much assume that 2005 was a horrific year when it comes to natural disasters.

And I didn't draw it that regular, but we can assume that all of these are each 120 degrees.

I think we can assume the boy ran out in a state of panic, having just killed his father.

Let's see, if we assume that x does not equal 2y, because then this would be undefined, we can cancel these two out.

The first thing we need to do is we need to assume that we know the length of the key. So let's just assume we know that.

We cannot assume that the apple or banana

We have to assume that this pattern continues.

But we'll just assume we start a corporation.

We can only assume, given wars and other uncertainties, that true market prices back then, like today, were quite volatile.

And if we assume that x isn't 0, it's just approaching 0, we can divide the numerator and the denominator by sine of x.

We turn on the faucet, the water comes out, we assume it's safe, and we assume that we are masters of our environment, rather than being part of it.

Well, if we assume that x is any number but 3, we can cross out these two terms because then they wouldn't be 0, right?

So for 8 hours, we assume it's practically safe.

But anyway, let's just assume we started at 0.

Let's assume that we were only given this graph.

Mr. Bendrix, I assume we are discussing Mrs. Bendrix.

You can just assume that it wasn't changing over that time period.