Financial Regulators Global Variety Show

Regulators for UPS

Chief of regulators.

Financial Regulators Fine Mess

More fundamentally, the US role at the center of the global financial system gives tremendous power to US courts, regulators, and politicians over global investment throughout the world.

Regulators, recognizing the risks of allowing financial deglobalization to accelerate, have been seeking better means of handling the failure of huge global banks.

This poses real challenges for regulators.

You regulators are all under arrest!

When financial regulations are devised by a coterie of global regulators in distant venues, it is bankers and technocrats who gain the upper hand.

Households, politicians, and regulators were also complicit.

Colleges of regulators, the supposed solution, are inadequate.

But what structures should regulators seek to encourage?

There was also bureaucratic resistance from existing regulators.

Regulators are typically not subject to those temptations.

Regulators may also have to revive old tools.

It remained entirely outside the purview of the regulators.

The regulators acquiesce because, simply put, they are afraid.

Regulators proved unable to forecast and prevent the crisis.

Regulators generally turned a blind eye to these suspicions.

Certainly, the trend toward full service single regulators outside the central bank has slowed to a crawl (though Indonesia is consolidating regulators at present).

But there is a risk for regulators and central banks.

The regulators called his bluff and forced him to resign.

But our regulators and politicians also suffered from intellectual capture.

Both regulators and clinicians who run trials have been criticized.

This is the point that the well intentioned regulators miss.

Competition authorities and sector regulators can coexist under various conditions.

And with all the internal regulators of my brain damaged,

The soundness and credibility of insolvency laws and director and officer practices are central to the efforts of governments and regulators to enhance the operation of the global financial system.

We cannot merely rely on regulators to do the right thing.

That has been a grave lesson for regulators and central banks.

Regulators should insist that traded derivatives are homogenous, standardized, and transparent.

To enforce the statute, regulators periodically examine banks for CRA compliance.

So the mutual fund industry had the regulators all to itself.

Bankers everywhere will rush to read it before their regulators do.

Source Adapted from OECD, Relationship between regulators and competition authorities, 1999.

Regulators have struggled with the problem for years without finding a solution.

As long as they manage their risks properly, regulators should be happy.

Moreover, only the regulators can examine the dossiers, which are highly confidential.

They established the system of ideas that bankers, politicians, and regulators applied.

In 1996, inconclusive clinical trials led US regulators to reject the drug.

Regulators have been wrestling with this problem for years, without conspicuous success.

But no wild bunch of regulators is coming in to make trouble.

Some, such as vitamin D, have hormone like functions as regulators of mineral metabolism, or regulators of cell and tissue growth and differentiation (such as some forms of vitamin A).

Although global standards supposedly reflect the principles of proportionality, they provide insufficient guidance for the national regulators, banking institutions, and financial sector assessors who are trying to apply them effectively in diverse environments.

Many scholars of international relations consider the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the international body of regulators charged with devising a new set of global standards, as the apogee of international rule making.