It would look like this.

Otherwise, it might look

So it's going to come out, and it's going to look something I could draw a better circle than that. It's going to look something like that's the top half, and then the bottom half is going to look something like that.

If I wanted to draw the line, it'll look like this.

Let's just draw that line, so that line will look something

It's an upward opening parabola, so it looks something like this.

If I blew it up a little bit, it would look something like this.

So if I were to draw that ellipse it would look something

So our line, our model if we graph it, looks like this.

So if I zoom in on just this part of the curve, it might look like that.

Right there the slope is 0, as well, because if you took the tangent it would look something like that.

And then of course, if we have a negative of a parabola, it becomes like that.

You can imagine if it had a handle, it would be kind of a big gallon of milk.

If we were just in the cube looking straight down at the base, it would look something like this.

So one comma two is here, and two, three three, four. three comma four is here, and if I want to draw a line through them, it'll look something like that.

If this was centered at 0 and it looked something like this. y squared over 25 minus x squared over 4 is equal to 1.

Or you could've multiplied, the other way to think about it is if I were to turn the parallelogram over, it would look something like this...

Especially if it has the same asymptotes just shifted, but centered at 0 it would look like this x squared over 16 minus y squared over 4 is equal to 1.

And if you were to look straight down on this plane, if you were to look right above the plane, this would look something this figure I just drew in purple would

If you compare our new treatment to the existing alternative, the composite aortic root graft, there are one or two startling comparisons which I'm sure will be clear to all of you.

If I have 1, 0, if I have the vector 1, 0, finding its transformation, if I were to flip it over, it's going to look something like this.

And when you isolate one of the radicals on one side of the equation, this one starts off like that, I have the square root of x isolated on the left hand side, then we square both sides of the equation.

And that question is this when we look around the world, as scientists have done for the last hundred years, there appear to be about 20 numbers that really describe our universe.