Revise the activity (European Classification, Rev.1.1) and product classifications (Classification of Products by Activity) in accordance with changes in the International Standard Industry Classification of All Economic Activities and the Central Product Classification

Final draft of the Central Product Classification, Version 2

Agriculture in the Central Product Classification, the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities and the International Standard Classification of Occupations

Review of the link between the Central Product Classification and the United Nations Standard Product and Services Code

The planned user's guide for the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities will address Central Product Classification issues as well.

(c) Noted that the deadlines in the revision processes of the International Standard Industrial Classification and the Central Product Classification (CPC) were highly important for the revision processes of other classifications and urged that efforts be undertaken to also keep the revision of the Central Product Classification on schedule

Such a review should be undertaken for economic classifications including the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, the Central Product Classification, the Standard International Trade Classification, the Classification by Broad Economic Categories and the classifications of expenditure according to purpose.

Gradually, its concepts and definitions became outdated as compared with the Harmonized System and the Central Product Classification.

The Commission is requested to review the draft and approve that structure as the recommended international product classification standard.

The consultative process for the revision of the Central Product Classification was based on the same principles and mechanism as the revision of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities.

The objectives of the 2007 revision of the Central Product Classification were formulated in terms of relevance, comparability and continuity.

Within the current broad structure of the Central Product Classification, ICT, information, health and other services products have been elaborated.

The correspondence table between the Central Product Classification and the Extended Balance of Payments Statistics will be revised in line with the revisions and clarifications arising from the revision of the System of National Accounts, the Balance of Payments Manual and the Central Product Classification revision.

The Commission will have before it the report of the Secretary General, providing information on recent developments, including the status of revision of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), the Central Product Classification (CPC), the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) and the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO).

Questions on the scope of the CPC, in particular a better understanding of the boundary between the product classification and an asset classification, have been resolved in cooperation with experts on National Accounts.

Research done for the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) was an important input as was the worldwide consultation in 2005.

Proposals for the Central Product Classification version 2.0 were to be finalized by the end of 2005 for submission to Statistical Commission.

Classification

Annex I (Inventory classification) Annex III (ACC classification)

The Technical Subgroup prepared a proposal for the work programme for the 2007 revision of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Revision 4, and the Central Product Classification, Version 2, in a multistage process.

The Technical Subgroup prepared a proposal for the programme of work for the 2007 revision, Central Product Classification, Version 2, in a multistage process.

Classification revisions

The first step resulted in the preparation of the Central Product Classification, Version 1.1, which was submitted and approved by the Statistical Commission in 2002.

3 For example, the European Classification (NACE), the North American Classification (NAICS) and the Australia New Zealand Classification (ANZSIC).

Remove Ham Classification

Remove Spam Classification

Remove Ham Classification

A. Post classification

The submission of the final structure for the proposed Central Product Classification, Version 2, to the present session of the Statistical Commission concludes a multi year programme that was undertaken in conjunction with the revision of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities.

Country Classification 2001 2005

The GATS classification includes

Benchmark Context Job classification.

Compensation and Classification Service

Language proficiency examination Classification

(c) Compensation and classification

(c) Compensation and classification

B. Classification of posts

CLASSIFICATION OF OVERSEAS EXAMS

In astronomy, stellar classification is the classification of stars based on their spectral characteristics.

The Statistical Commission mandated the beginning of the revision in 1999 following its review of the report entitled Evaluation of progress in the implementation of International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Revision 3 and the Central Product Classification, Version 1.0 (E CN.3 1999 16).

The worldwide consultation for the Central Product Classification (using questionnaires) was initially combined with the ISIC revision, in which the first two questionnaires covered both ISIC and CPC issues.

25C.42 In the area of classification, approved classification standards will be implemented for the Professional, Field Service and General Service and related categories, classification standards will be developed, existing classification structures will be reviewed and the classification system will be integrated within the overall management process.

You write the two columns again, you say, ok, this product plus this product plus this product, minus this product minus this product minus that product.

Globally Harmonized System of Classification

2.1.3.5.5 Default fireworks classification table