(ii) Habeas corpus and amparo

2. The remedy of habeas corpus

(c) Habeas corpus de lege ferenda

(a) Habeas corpus in Salvadorian positive law

(f) Enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of habeas corpus

2. The remedy of habeas corpus . 259 291 45

5. ONUSAL recommendations some recommendations coincide (i.e., habeas corpus).

(b) The reported limited accessibility and effectiveness of habeas corpus

4. Measures to make habeas corpus and amparo effective and accessible

This procedure represents the implementation of the principle of habeas corpus.

(b) The ineffectiveness of the remedy of habeas corpus in judicial practice

Court decisions on habeas corpus resulting in the release of the accused

The police say you intend to resist this writ of habeas corpus.

The 1871 Civil Rights Act allowed President Ulysses S. Grant to suspend Habeas Corpus.

Mr. CHANDRANSU (Thailand) said that his Government did not intend to suspend habeas corpus procedures.

General concern had been expressed that the writ of habeas corpus was soon to be suspended.

4. Amendment to the legislation governing remedies of habeas corpus and amparo to make them effective.

2. Measures must be taken to make the remedies of amparo and habeas corpus truly effective.

The second chapter consists of a complicated legal proceeding known as a state habeas corpus appeal.

For modern times, the most enduring legacy of Magna Carta is considered the right of habeas corpus.

The Government has submitted to national debate a draft bill which amends the legislation regarding habeas corpus.

4. Amendment of the legislation governing the remedies of habeas corpus and amparo to make them effective

Saravia filed a writ of habeas corpus, on which the Supreme Court took a year to rule.

The third chapter is an even more complicated legal proceeding known as a federal habeas corpus proceeding.

I think you oughta know that in my jail... we never heard of the words habeas corpus.

Even though his lawyer subsequently applied for habeas corpus to the Supreme Court, this application was never adjudicated.

The Inter American Court of Human Rights ruled in 1987 that habeas corpus is a non derogable right.

The Commission takes into account that controls for detention procedures and the right of habeas corpus exist in Colombia.

But there is no rule of law left in Zimbabwe no habeas corpus and no check on arbitrary state action.

This is why the Sub Commission should once again recommend the adoption of the right of habeas corpus or amparo.

As for the intention to exact a law establishing habeas corpus, she wondered why it was not possible to follow the example of the United Kingdom and Israel and impute habeas corpus through an interpretation of existing administrative law, thereby removing the need for a separate statute.

This is because the right to judicial control does not exist owing to the ineffectiveness of the remedy of habeas corpus.

289. The meeting provided an opportunity to compare the different opinions held in El Salvador on the question of habeas corpus.

Prison conditions were being improved. The Government was preparing a habeas corpus bill, and intended to move towards abolishing the death penalty.

Even though his lawyer subsequently, on 29 October 1999, applied for habeas corpus to the Supreme Court, this application was never adjudicated.

The Supreme Court of Justice, before which the matter was brought by means of a remedy of habeas corpus, confirmed the decision.

1. Competence of judges and magistrates to hear the remedy of habeas corpus amend article 174, article 182 (1) and article 247.

The provisions of the Covenant thus embody the essential features of amparo and habeas corpus, although all specific references to habeas corpus were removed from earlier drafts of the Covenant in order to give States the possibility of developing similar procedures within the framework of their own legal and judicial systems.

Other relevant human rights mechanisms have recommended that there should be no possibility of derogation from rights such as habeas corpus and amparo.

The conclusions established that, in terms of its current substantive and procedural regulation, habeas corpus is extremely ineffective in protecting fundamental individual rights.

Other amendments to the institution of habeas corpus and the draft new code of criminal procedure are being discussed with the legal community.

281. These refer mainly to applications for habeas corpus in respect of pre trial detention in proceedings relating to a variety of offences.

Second, there are the constitutional amendments, whereby judges of first instance would be competent to deal with issues of habeas corpus and amparo.

2.8 It is noted that the author apos s lawyer twice applied to the High Court of Cameroon for writs of habeas corpus.

Thirteen months later, in July 2002, Mr. Morales Hernández filed a writ of habeas corpus. On 9 August 2002, the writ of habeas corpus was rejected by the Pereira circuit criminal court, which found that the court concerned had been unable to deliver a judgement because of bottlenecks or a heavy workload.