Similarly, during the hearing on 6 July 1999, the Circuit Court refused to allow the author to testify or to otherwise participate in the hearing.

Magistrates apos Court to attend a hearing.

He'll hold a hearing and reverse the court decision.

The Court will begin hearing the case on July 5.

The next day, during the court hearing on custody, he was once more informed about the charges, also in the presence of an interpreter.

She claims that no translator was present during the District Court hearing of 22 July 1999 and that the contradictions the court found in her story are attributable to problems of interpretation.

During the appeal hearing, counsel to the author requested the Court for a hearing of staff working for Daimler Benz in Germany, with a view to understanding better the method of identification used by this company.

As a consequence, the court postponed the hearing until 23 February 1996 and ordered the author's compulsory appearance at the hearing.

The Court did not acknowledge receipt of the motion to delay the hearing.

During this hearing, he referred to the judge as his fiancée .

The court has not yet announced the date and time of the appeal hearing.

The public hearing was held on 21 July 1992 in the Sixth Criminal Court.

One doesn't work at the zoo long without hearing of Frenchy de la Court.

Privileges and immunities during court proceedings

(a) The author did not receive legal advice during the preliminary hearing.

The Court of Appeal functioned during 2004.

During the hearing, on 6 October 1986, the author retracted his earlier statements.

For example, the Court held an online public hearing on victims and defence issues in the preparation of the Regulations of the Court.6 This hearing allowed wide participation in the process of adopting the Regulations and the Court received responses from all over the world.

Everyone has the right to seek a hearing of his case by a competent, impartial court.

Article 22 privileges and immunities during court proceedings

The only other opportunity to give instructions and discuss the case with his legal representatives took place at the court for five minutes each day during the trial, before the hearing started.

However, from the minutes of the hearing before the Court of Appeal, it appears that counsel as well as the author abandoned the idea of hearing further witnesses.

On October 10, the villagers lawyers were told that the court hearing scheduled that day was canceled.

The individuals in question were summoned to the court and after a brief hearing were set free.

According to the author, the Supreme Court followed its usual practice of not hearing the testimony of any witnesses during the review process, relying solely upon the lower courts' appreciation of the evidence.

The Committee has also noted that because of the considerable lapse of time between the hearing of the appeal and delivery of the reasons for judgement, the Court of Appeal was unable to rely on its memory of the hearing of the appeal and had to confine its reasons to such notes as were made during the hearing of the appeal.

On 15 March 1996, the Plock District Court held a closed hearing on the motion to change liquidators.

The two judges of the Supreme Court availed themselves of this option and author's counsel stated expressly during the oral questioning at the public hearing of 4 October 1999 that he did not object.

4.3 As to the author apos s claims under article 14, paragraph 3 (e), the Committee notes that these issues were raised by counsel during the hearing when he addressed the Court of Appeal.

2.7 The author was represented by legal aid attorneys during the preliminary hearing and on appeal.

A court hearing has been set on June 1 to hear the claims of the representative of the government.

In the State party's view, it cannot be held responsible for the author's inability to attend each court hearing.

During the hearing of this motion on 6 February 2003, the author was summarily convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment (meaning that he would be compelled to perform hard labour).

The briefing was completed during the reporting period and the case is being prepared for a hearing.

The European Court of Human Rights is hearing oral arguments in two of the most important cases in its history.

According to the author, this request was delivered to the Court by 8.00 a.m. on the day of the hearing.

The hearing was not held in open Court but in the judge's chambers and according to the author neither he nor his lawyer were notified of the time and place of the hearing.

The Commission took 71 cases to court during the same period.

During the same period, the Commission took 30 cases to court.

During the pleadings before the Court, Australia's counsel stated as follows

However, the actual extradition will take longer if the suspect contests it, as at least one court hearing would be required.

And you're not hearing the same thing that most people who have normal hearing are hearing.

For these reasons, on 26 January 1996, the court held a hearing at which the author, albeit duly summoned, did not appear.

The first pre trial hearing took place on 4 August and the Dili district court has scheduled a trial for 3 September.

First, the court carrying out the hearing is an anti constitutional one, having been created by a self proclaimed and unrecognized State.