Losses asserted in the nine additional deceased detainee claims

The total amount asserted for claims preparation costs is USD 76,339.12.

The Panel has made recommendations with respect to the remaining personal losses asserted in these claims.

A number of claims in the fourth instalment raise the issue of irregularities in documents supporting asserted losses.

International courts, including the International Court of Justice, had asserted that the doctrine had no special place in claims involving diplomatic protection.

Receivables Seven of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for receivables for a total asserted value of KWD 852,471 (approximately USD 2,949,727).

Notwithstanding the verified business licences, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for the asserted business losses in each of these three claims.

Tangible property Sixteen of the stand alone claims seek compensation for tangible property losses for a total asserted value of KWD 4,545,213 (approximately USD 15,727,381).

Other losses Twelve of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for other losses for a total asserted value of KWD 409,306 (approximately USD 1,416,284).

The Panel finds that two of the claims do not meet the criteria for compensability of the asserted losses, while another is a duplicate claim.

The claims are rejected.

They argue that, under the settled principles of international law, loss of life and reduced quality of life of nationals of a State represent injuries to the State, and claims for such injuries can be asserted as State claims rather than as the claims of individual nationals.

Duplicate claims are two or more claims filed by an individual in the same claims category.

Loss of profits Fourteen of the claims in this instalment seek compensation for loss of profits for a total asserted value of KWD 1,278,108 (approximately USD 4,422,519).

These claims are wildly overstated.

These claims are discussed below.

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

The Panel also determined that irregularities in documents that support the losses asserted do not adversely impact on the claimant's eligibility to participate in the late claims programme.

During the regular category D claims programme, non Kuwaiti claimants asserted losses in relation to businesses they owned and operated under rent a permit agreements with the licence holders.

There are several examples. First, the Secretary General in his report A 47 414, asserted that

These claims are included in this report.

The claims in this paragraph are rejected.

These are not invalid complaints and claims.

the claims are down by the river.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

The Board noted that some of these former participants had asserted legal claims against the Board before various judicial and other organs, and these procedures would first have to be completed.

In those cases, the E4 Panel recommended no compensation for the claims when they were reviewed, as the E4 claimants had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support their asserted losses.

Category A claims are for departure related losses.

Currently, claims for disability or injury are 2,700.

In order to evaluate the extent to which the individual claimants might have asserted losses in connection with a Kuwaiti company that had filed a claim in category E , the D and E4 Panels requested that computer searches be conducted against the Commission's claims database from claims filed in category D and against claims for business losses filed by individuals for amounts less than USD 100,000 (category C claims).

multiple claims Two or more claims in category C that were submitted under the late claims programme by individuals who are related to each other.

The Panel recommends no compensation in respect of three category C claims that are duplicates of three other claims filed within this late claims programme.

Romney asserted that his foreign policy was pretty straightforward.

The total amount asserted for interest is USD 14,169,831.69.

Fifth, for some claims in this instalment the audited financial statements were the only third party evidence submitted to substantiate the existence and ownership of the business and the quantum of the asserted losses.

Among the categories of intangibles are claims and receivables.

That constitutes incontestable proof that our claims are just.

There are 2,74 claims for C4 CPHO losses and 65 claims for C4 MV losses in the fourth instalment.

This global approach was suited to the specifics of category C claims processing, as category C claims are subject to mass claims processing procedures and are not subject to extensive individual review or claim development.

For the reasons set out in paragraphs 34 37 of the Special Overlap Report and in paragraphs 22 25 below, the Panel considers that, although these claims appeared upon initial review to have some indicia of an overlap relationship, there was no actual overlap between the losses asserted in those claims.

No overlap due to the nature of the loss asserted

Other witnesses asserted that the attackers arrived on foot. 535

Claims for loss of business income are claims for income that would have been earned over a period of time.

The IMF rightly points out that these claims are nonsense.

He claims they are drowning as their icy habitat disappears.