Based on the Novel Peaceful Days by SHUGORO YAMAMOTO

The tactical mastermind of the Pearl Harbor operation, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, was one of them.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan), Mr. Sandoval (Chile) and Mr. Nordlander (Sweden) supported the United States proposal.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) and Mr. Sandoval (Chile) expressed support for the principle of implicit derogation.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation had no strong views regarding draft paragraph 1 (b).

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) associated himself with the proposal made by Italy as fine tuned by the United States.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) described some of the significant space related activities that had taken place in his country in the past year.

The operation was indecisive, and Yamamoto himself became a casualty of Allied intelligence and air power in the Solomon Islands later that year.

Mr. Field (United States of America), Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) and Mr. Yang Lixin (China) expressed support for the formulation suggested by the Secretariat.

After both houses of Diet refused to pass the 1914 Navy budget, Yamamoto resigned on 24 March 1914, bringing down his entire cabinet with him.

The composition of the Chamber for Fisheries Disputes, in order of precedence, is as follows Judge Caminos, President Judges Yamamoto, Kolodkin, Park, Wolfrum, Ndiaye and Jesus, members.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation could support the draft article if REIOs did not enjoy rights, especially voting rights, in addition to those of its members.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his Government recognized that an opportunity currently existed to advance the Middle East process, and it had become actively engaged in that undertaking.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation took it that paragraph 2, as currently drafted, dealt only with cases in which a party had more than one place of business.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation could not endorse the proposal to introduce a two year deadline, as such limitations were a matter of public policy in many legal systems.

7. Mr. E. YAMAMOTO (Japan) said that the dramatic changes marking the end of the cold war had provided the international community with a new opportunity to create a more secure world.

It was in that spirit that the (Mr. Yamamoto, Japan) international community had begun to consolidate the existing international legal framework through various conventions and protocols, thus broadening the range of punishable acts.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) stated that his delegation, which had always supported the common system, believed that its homogeneity should be preserved to keep employment conditions equal and consistent across the system as a whole.

Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) noted with satisfaction the adoption by UNCITRAL of the Model Law on Procurement of Goods and Construction, which had been drafted by the Working Group on the New International Economic Order.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) reiterated his proposal, which was that the commentary should state that draft article 2, paragraph 1 (a), covered not only consumer contracts but also other contracts concluded for personal, family or household purposes.

Furthermore, in drafting the articles relating to tentative measures and jurisdiction, the Working Group should give due and (Mr. Yamamoto, Japan) careful consideration to the legal system of each country, since those articles related directly to procedural law.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation had always fully supported the common system, which not only enabled each participating organization to avoid burdensome administrative arrangements but also ensured equal and consistent conditions of service, thereby eliminating unnecessary competition.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that the draft convention should make it clear that if a party had more than one place of business and could be shown to have indicated the wrong location, draft article 6, paragraph 2, would apply.

Unbeknownst to Yamamoto, who conceived the original plan, the U.S. Navy had decided as far back as 1935 to abandon 'charging' across the Pacific towards the Philippines in response to an outbreak of war (in keeping with the evolution of Plan Orange).

15. Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) said that, in its statement in the Special Political Committee in 1992, his delegation had expressed its sincere appreciation for the completion of the work of the Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space.

54. Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) thanked the Legal Counsel, Mr. Fleischhauer, for his introduction to the report of the Secretary General on measures to eliminate international terrorism (A 48 267 and Add.1), which provided a useful basis for the work of the Committee.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that draft article 6, paragraph 2, did not seem to be applicable to a case in which a party had more than one place of business but indicated a place of business that was subsequently demonstrated by a third party to be fictional.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that the meaning of draft article 2, paragraph 1 (a), Contracts concluded for personal, family or household purposes , was ambiguous and should be clarified in the commentary. Otherwise States would be unsure which matters ought to be excluded by means of a declaration under draft article 18.