Jump up and down.

We must not jump to conclusions.

Let's jump ahead again.

But we must not jump to conclusions.

We don't want to skip too many steps here.

Throw the jet thrusters off exactly when we jump. And then we're gonna put them on, and we gonna go down nice and slow.

You can't make us jump through the hoop!

It is more worthy to leap in ourselves than tarry till they push us.

In Linz we hop a barge and go to uim.

So why aren't we jumping up and down about this?

When we were kids, I used to jump out behind corners, and one time...

We can jump those Comancheros... Monsewer, you've changed.

We turn the thrusters off, we jump this thing, we float right over it.

We can offer ourselves as agents so whenever some opportunity comes, rather we should jump for that.

Sure, we can even hop one to California if we wanted to.

Or we could have skipped this step and written x minus 2 squared is equal to 9.

Say, maybe this winter we can hop a freight to Florida.

No stops till then. We'll have to jump off.

No, what I'm suggesting is that we should leap off, we should increase our velocity so it's high, and we should leap off one side and go the other of course, having calculated our differential equation very carefully.

Will you leave if I kill him?

And then we jump to Von Neumann, 1945, when he sort of reinvents the whole same thing.

It's a thermal behavior that you and I do if we cross the beach, we jump onto a towel, somebody has this towel

And the concept of the company was that we would leapfrog past the analog processes of optical printers and so on, and we would go right to digital production.

I could've just divided by 4 here, which might have made it skipped a step.

And so when you have these graphics cards or these graphics engines, all they are you know, we're jumping away from the theoretical.

HC So this is where we step into the future and we leapfrog ahead.

So back in the day, when us Indians wanted to travel we'd jump into a chariot and we'd zoom across the sky.

It's going to be zero everywhere until we get to minus t, and then at minus t, we're going to jump up to some level.

To remain relevant, to form part of that change, we must together jump with both feet into the waters of conventional unreason.

So this is where we step into the future and we leapfrog ahead.

Jumping quickly to the fifth rung, we conclude that this guy is heartless, inconsiderate, he needs to be taught a lesson and put in his place.

So the first traces, and I'm skipping out in and really it's just what we can find.

If we mind the gap, we can make the leap to a better, more inclusive form of globalization.

And then you fast forward and I am sure even our historians don't know all the different instances of people using Algebra.

So we should not leap to the conclusion that if most engineers are men, there must be discrimination against women.

But we must also not be hasty or leap in the dark and in no way should we generate inequities.

So it's going to be zero everywhere, and then at minus tau, we jump to this level, and then we stay constant at that level until we get to plus tau.

As I said, I hate to go back. But if it can get us out of this hole, can we retreat a little in order to jump forward, accelerate and gain a few more steps ahead? Then, I think, we will be fine.

Of course, just as it was inappropriate to extrapolate from the previous decade of strong growth, one should not read too much into short term fluctuations.

So let's move up by two. I'll do that in this orange color. So let's go up by 2.

No, what I'm suggesting is that we should leap off, we should increase our velocity so it's high, and we should leap off one side and go the other of course, having calculated our differential equation very carefully.

On top of that, let us make a major leap of imagination and suppose that even though this scenario of the EU at Year Zero means we would not have a half century of intra European cooperation to draw on, the nations that today make up the EU would nevertheless be keen to adopt far reaching joint policies.