Well, I have both.

They can't be exactly the same.

I said, No, both are ditches.

It's very difficult to line things up so neatly.

You can have both.

Now it's only at precise times when they align.

Thus, in either one of these scenarios and let's just think in a broad sense.

But I'm not here to share these stories about these two things exactly.

But the situation has become like this, I cannot mess up both.

I'll prove them wrong on both points.

I should be interested to hear what you find out in either case.

I thought you could never belong to anyone, never care for anyone.

The great source of both the misery and disorders of human life seems to arise from overrating the difference between one permanent situation and another

You get better decision making, and you get less herd behavior, and both of those things hit your bottom line with very positive results.

Or you are missing someone

No one is allowed.

Eggnog, anybody?

Brandon at someone's feet!

I'm not giving it to anyone.

I owe nothing.

We don't need anyone.

Don't mention this to anyone.

Sami needs someone to help him.

They never passed on any of the wealth.

I'm not affiliated with anything

And here is an example of one of her analyses

For the sake of someone... that he loves?

They never passed on any of the wealth,

For nobody else gave me a thrill

I stick my neck out for nobody.

I threw you at nobody.

I don't need anyone.

One never can tell.

No cross words ever pass her lips. You would harness this angel

Let no one come in.

They're nobody's fans.

They're nobody's audience.

Some Hollywood movie star.

A secret. You'll tell nobody but Hugo.

We won't tell anybody.

I am the enemy of no man.

To give to some little boy as a present.

Things don't belong to anybody.

I'm nobody's type.

at one of the hospitals mentioned below.