Military power is important.

Has Economic Power Replaced Military Might?

Military force has played a role as well.

As the efficacy of military power is reduced, so the importance of economic power grows.

We will need the application of military force.

Is Military Power Becoming Obsolete?

Military strength of the United Nations Protection Force

Hard power, which relies on coercion, grows out of military and economic might.

Doesn't tell you much about military power, doesn't tell you very much about soft power.

Australian Army The Australian Army is Australia's military land force.

The world is moving from military might to social priorities.

Top board military power among states.

The limits of military power have been exposed.

Economic resources can produce soft power behavior as well as hard military power.

As for America, it is down in terms of both soft ideological power and hard military power.

But it is a mistake to count too much on hard or soft power alone.

Imagine this situation without America s military and political strength.

Leviathan Force, it's all about joint operations between the military services.

China's not going to replace the U.S. on this military board.

It took hard military power to sever that tie.

Traditionally, the way people thought about power was primarily in terms of military power.

We do not want to give lessons, but we repeat again that the Chetniks apos forces, with Karadzic as their leader, respect only military force and military defeat.

The US government spends 450 times more on hard military power than on soft power.

China s massive arms build up shows that economic power without military power is only a temporary phenomenon.

On the top board of military power among countries, the US is the only superpower. On the middle board of economic relations among countries, the world is already multipolar.

That may be true in the domain of hard military power, but it is not true of soft power resources.

55. Office of the Force Commander. The Force Commander is required to conduct negotiations with both military authorities and belligerent groups throughout the mission area and to oversee the formulation of military contingency plans.

There has been an ongoing recruitment of personnel who form the basis of the military force, and constitute the al Ittihad's de facto army.

VIII. Military strength of the United Nations Protection Force authorized by the Security Council . 76

This has resulted in an average decrease of 58 per cent in the military strength.

Is it military strength? Well, we have the world's fourth largest army.

While military power remains important, it is a mistake for any country to discount the role of economic power and soft power.

The Force Commander would chair the Ceasefire Joint Military Committee and the sector commanders would chair the area joint military committees in their respective sectors.

In this respect, the delegation of Egypt wishes to stress the importance of facing up to non military threats with the same vigour and determination we show in confronting military threats.

Not only are their military, or hard power, resources growing there are signs that their soft power resources are increasing, too.

The Obama administration committed itself to global leadership through civilian rather than military power.

Military force, along with norms and institutions, helps to provide a minimal degree of order.

As Iraq has shown, hard military power alone cannot provide a solution.

America s military and economic strength reinforces confidence in the dollar as a safe haven.

They are coercive, but they fall short of the threat or use of military force. Will they be enough to stop the killing?

The Gulf War confirmed American military might and the age old perils of appeasement.

Russia has a number of means of pressuring Ukraine short of using military force.

The manner in which we use military power also affects Rumsfeld s ratio.

The moral authority of the United Nations has been reasserted over military might.

And we need to move away from internationalizing the internal problems of various States through military force.